These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849297)

  • 1. Comparison of HSPF and SWAT models performance for runoff and sediment yield prediction.
    Im S; Brannan KM; Mostaghimi S; Kim SM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Sep; 42(11):1561-70. PubMed ID: 17849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulating fecal coliform bacteria loading from an urbanizing watershed.
    Im S; Brannan KM; Mostaghimi S; Cho J
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(3):663-79. PubMed ID: 15055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrologic and atrazine simulation of the Cedar Creek Watershed using the SWAT model.
    Larose M; Heathman GC; Norton LD; Engel B
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(2):521-31. PubMed ID: 17332256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using detailed monitoring data to simulate spatial sediment loading in a watershed.
    Mukundan R; Pierson DC; Schneiderman EM; Zion MS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Aug; 187(8):532. PubMed ID: 26215828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling sediment and nitrogen export from a rural watershed in eastern Canada using the soil and water assessment tool.
    Nafees Ahmad HM; Sinclair A; Jamieson R; Madani A; Hebb D; Havard P; Yiridoe EK
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1182-94. PubMed ID: 21712588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of runoff and sediment yield in the Redrock Creek watershed using AnnAGNPS and GIS.
    Tsou MS; Zhan XY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(5):865-7. PubMed ID: 15559830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A SWAT model validation of nested-scale contemporaneous stream flow, suspended sediment and nutrients from a multiple-land-use watershed of the central USA.
    Zeiger SJ; Hubbart JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():232-243. PubMed ID: 27501422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sediment measurement and transport modeling: impact of riparian and filter strip buffers.
    Moriasi DN; Steiner JL; Arnold JG
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):807-14. PubMed ID: 21546666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a turfgrass sod best management practice on water quality in a suburban watershed.
    Richards CE; Munster CL; Vietor DM; Arnold JG; White R
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 17298864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of runoff and nutrient export from a typical small watershed in China using the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran.
    Li Z; Liu H; Luo C; Li Y; Li H; Pan J; Jiang X; Zhou Q; Xiong Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 May; 22(10):7954-66. PubMed ID: 25516253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management-oriented sensitivity analysis for pesticide transport in watershed-scale water quality modeling using SWAT.
    Luo Y; Zhang M
    Environ Pollut; 2009 Dec; 157(12):3370-8. PubMed ID: 19616876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM.
    Lee SB; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Hwang HS
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1401-9. PubMed ID: 20861556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TREX: spatially distributed model to assess watershed contaminant transport and fate.
    Velleux ML; England JF; Julien PY
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Oct; 404(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 18649925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Parameter sensitivity analysis of runoff simulation and model adaptability research based on HSPF].
    Li Y; Li ZF; Xi Q
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jun; 34(6):2139-45. PubMed ID: 23947025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the SWAT model to the Xiangjiang river watershed in subtropical central China.
    Luo Q; Li Y; Wang K; Wu J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(9):2110-6. PubMed ID: 23656956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia.
    Benham BL; Brannan KM; Yagow G; Zeckoski RW; Dillaha TA; Mostaghimi S; Wynn JW
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1860-72. PubMed ID: 16151238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale.
    Wang X; Shang S; Qu Z; Liu T; Melesse AM; Yang W
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1511-25. PubMed ID: 20236754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling phosphorus transport in an agricultural watershed using the WEPP model.
    Perez-Bidegain M; Helmers MJ; Cruse R
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(6):2121-9. PubMed ID: 21284310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the Hydrology and water quality using BASINS/HSPF for the upper Maurice River watershed, New Jersey.
    Shirinian-Orlando AA; Uchrin CG
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Feb; 42(3):289-303. PubMed ID: 17365295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overcoming equifinality: time-varying analysis of sensitivity and identifiability of SWAT runoff and sediment parameters in an arid and semiarid watershed.
    Wu L; Liu X; Chen J; Yu Y; Ma X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31631-31645. PubMed ID: 35006572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.