BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849632)

  • 1. The proper focus for FDA regulations: why the fundamental right to self-preservation should allow terminally ill patients with no treatment options to attempt to save their lives.
    Puckett A
    SMU Law Rev; 2007; 60(2):635-65. PubMed ID: 17849632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA's proposed regulations to expand access to investigational drugs for treatment use: the status quo in the guise of reform.
    Rossen BR
    Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(1):183-223. PubMed ID: 19998746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study in futility: Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs will not expand access to experimental drugs for the terminally ill.
    Ochs A
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):559-603. PubMed ID: 19462540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No way to save a life: allowing terminally ill patients access to drugs that have not completed clinical trials is a dangerous move.
    Moss RW
    New Sci; 2006 Jun 3-9; 190(2554):21. PubMed ID: 16832956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Access before approval--a right to take experimental drugs?
    Okie S
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 16885545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The terminally ill, access to investigational drugs, and FDA rules.
    Blake V
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Aug; 15(8):687-91. PubMed ID: 23937785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanded access to investigational drugs for treatment use. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(155):40900-45. PubMed ID: 19691173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the laboratory of the states: the progress of Glucksberg's invitation to states to address end-of-life choice.
    Tucker KL
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1593-612. PubMed ID: 18595217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual patient treatment use of unapproved drugs: a new option for the seriously ill.
    Simon LS; Green A
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2010 Mar; 24(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 20345195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional law--substantive due process--en banc D.C. Circuit rejects fundamental right to experimental medications.--Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007)(en banc), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1069 (2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 121(6):1685-92. PubMed ID: 18524069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Charging for investigational drugs under an investigational new drug application. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(155):40871-900. PubMed ID: 19691172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US court rules to allow experimental drugs for dying patients.
    Waltz E
    Nat Med; 2006 Jun; 12(6):596. PubMed ID: 16760988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should terminally ill patients have access to phase I drugs?
    Bristol N
    Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9564):815-6. PubMed ID: 17366691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right to try?
    Lieu CH; Sorkin A; Messersmith WA
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(13):1518. PubMed ID: 25779561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
    Kamisar Y
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer and the constitution--choice at life's end.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 17652658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access for the terminally ill to experimental medical innovations: a three-pronged threat.
    Bender S; Flicker L; Rhodes R
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 Oct; 7(10):3-6. PubMed ID: 17926208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term care: end-of-life issues. Issue brief.
    Miller KG
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 20217925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The question remains: are there terminally ill patients who have a constitutional right to physician assistance in hastening the dying process.
    Hermann DH
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1997; 1(3):445-93. PubMed ID: 15282883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term care: end-of-life issues. End-of-year issue brief.
    Jones CA; Miller KG
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2008 Jan; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 18345562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.