These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849636)

  • 1. Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Kordas TM; Pellegrino JT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):482-95. PubMed ID: 17849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC; Marriage J
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 14974623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users.
    Marriage J; Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 15250124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids.
    Wood SA; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Mar; 43(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 15198378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure.
    Surr RK; Kolb JA; Cord MT; Garrus NP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):489-95. PubMed ID: 10522622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: predictive validity of fitting variables. Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life.
    Hosford-Dunn H; Halpern J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11214976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
    Mueller HG; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):461-72. PubMed ID: 16295233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):555-62. PubMed ID: 15724519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid maximum output and loudness discomfort: are unaided loudness measures needed?
    Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 17849638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data.
    Uriarte M; Denzin L; Dunstan A; Sellars J; Hickson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):383-402. PubMed ID: 16178409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Satisfaction assessment with Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire on people using hearing aid having Real Ear Measurement (REM) eligibility.
    Turan S; Unsal S; Kurtaran H
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Sep; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 32009342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.
    Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.