These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849638)

  • 1. Hearing aid maximum output and loudness discomfort: are unaided loudness measures needed?
    Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 17849638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
    Mueller HG; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):461-72. PubMed ID: 16295233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement.
    Peek BF; Rosenfeld MA; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 17580724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and maximum power output in subjects recently fitted with NHS hearing aids.
    Munro KJ; Nind L; Cleaver VC
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Aug; 30(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 8879692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 1531242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.
    Thrailkill KM; Brennan MA; Jesteadt W
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):143-155. PubMed ID: 29794566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aided loudness growth and satisfaction with everyday loudness perception in compression hearing aid users.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Zwislockit JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Mar; 18(3):206-19. PubMed ID: 17479614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness discomfort levels and saturation levels in hearing aids prescribed for young persons.
    Israelsson B; Sandh A; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 8750755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-site evaluation of a proposed test for verifying hearing aid maximum output.
    Keidser G; Bentler R; Kiessling J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 20053153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.