These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849638)

  • 21. Are clinical measurements of uncomfortable loudness levels a valid indicator of real-world auditory discomfort?
    Munro KJ; Patel RK
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 9845026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Kordas TM; Pellegrino JT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):482-95. PubMed ID: 17849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort.
    Filion PR; Margolis RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 May; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 1581594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of custom-fit versus fixed-format hearing aids for precipitously sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Walden TC; Walden BE; Cord MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002; 13(7):356-66. PubMed ID: 12199512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fitting and verification of frequency modulation systems on children with normal hearing.
    Schafer EC; Bryant D; Sanders K; Baldus N; Algier K; Lewis A; Traber J; Layden P; Amin A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 25313543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preliminary evidence of asymmetry in uncomfortable loudness levels after unilateral hearing aid experience: evidence of functional plasticity in the adult auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Trotter JH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):684-8. PubMed ID: 17132556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The selection and validation of output sound pressure level in multichannel hearing aids.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Cunningham DR
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):487-500. PubMed ID: 11770671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Pok SM; Schlögel M; Böheim K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 69():51-58. PubMed ID: 20610914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.