These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849641)

  • 1. The ethics of withdrawal from study participation.
    Gordon EJ; Prohaska TR
    Account Res; 2006; 13(4):285-309. PubMed ID: 17849641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The shell game: how institutional review boards shuffle words.
    Whitney SN
    J Transl Med; 2014 Aug; 12():201. PubMed ID: 25123670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
    Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
    Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.
    Mammel KA; Kaplan DW
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent for a device investigation.
    Munzner R
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2004; 23(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 15355002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. And you thought the consent document was long enough already.
    Teresi ME
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2003; 43(5):552-4. PubMed ID: 14626744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
    Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research subjects with limited English proficiency: ethical and legal issues.
    Resnik DB; Jones CW
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):157-77. PubMed ID: 16830406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.
    Klitzman RL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Feb; 8(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 23485667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial.
    Silverman H; Hull SC; Sugarman J
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 11246299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research.
    Kennedy BJ
    J Bioeth; 1984; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10271128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human subjects in dental research: coping with the regulations. Council on Dental Research.
    Gibson WA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Feb; 110(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 3856606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The IRB process needs to be reexamined.
    Esaki R; Macario A; Harrison TK; Brock-Utne JG
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1249-50. PubMed ID: 21515655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.
    Klitzman R
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 23475805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative thematic analysis of consent forms used in cancer genome sequencing.
    Allen C; Foulkes WD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2011 Jul; 12():14. PubMed ID: 21771309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule.
    Sugarman J
    Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):22-26. PubMed ID: 28661754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A review of the most frequent objections made to patient information sheets of clinical trials].
    López-Parra M; Moreno-Quiroga C; Lechuga-Pérez J
    Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Jul; 139(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 22560053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.