These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849749)
41. Efficiency of Brazilian public services of kidney transplantation: Benchmarking Brazilian states via data envelopment analysis. Siqueira MM; Araujo CAS Int J Health Plann Manage; 2018 Oct; 33(4):e1067-e1087. PubMed ID: 30052275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. New study benchmarks performance of ASCs. DeJohn P OR Manager; 2012 Mar; 28(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 22493837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Effective use of workload and productivity monitoring tools in health-system pharmacy, part 2. Rough SS; McDaniel M; Rinehart JR Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 Mar; 67(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 20172989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Proposed: a standard clinical engineering review procedure. Pakaln A Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16941930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Benchmarking process reaps reductions in Medicare A/R days. Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1999 Apr; 3(4):52-5. PubMed ID: 10557960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. On sculpture, baseball, and benchmarking.. Maddock K; Hertzler L Biomed Instrum Technol; 2007; 41(4):332. PubMed ID: 17849765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A critical review of financial measures as reported in the Ontario hospital balanced scorecard. Parkinson J; Tsasis P; Porporato M J Health Care Finance; 2007; 34(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 18972993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bioartificial organs as outcomes of tissue engineering. Scientific and regulatory issues. Hellman KB Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1997 Dec; 831():1-9. PubMed ID: 9616697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Other voices. Setting bold, but achievable goals. Corrigan J Hosp Health Netw; 2009 Jan; 83(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 19266719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Delivering Team-Focused Technology to the Bedside. Fix J; Stiles DA Biomed Instrum Technol; 2016; 50(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 26829138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Why it is not sufficient to study errors and incidents: human factors and safety in medical systems. Gopher D Biomed Instrum Technol; 2004; 38(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 15521515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. He said, she said: making sense of multiple standards and recommended practices. Schule R Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 19480533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Why bad things happen to good clinical engineers. Harrington DP J Clin Eng; 1996; 21(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 10155902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Benchmarking for best practice in critical care medicine: can it realistically be done? Angood PB; Ivy ME; Hardy JR; Merrel RC Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(4):154-61. PubMed ID: 9362613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Practice Brief. Using benchmarking for performance improvement. American Health Information Management Association J AHIMA; 2003 Feb; 74(2):64A-64D. PubMed ID: 12600173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Implementation of evidence-based practice and organizational performance. Hovmand PS; Gillespie DF J Behav Health Serv Res; 2010 Jan; 37(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 19085109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Development of a method to measure and compare hospital waste: the Premier hospital waste index. Lowe TJ; Kroch E; Martin J; Bankowitz R Am J Med Qual; 2014; 29(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 23687221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]