252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17850412)
1. The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies.
Scarpulla G; Camilleri S; Galante P; Manganaro M; Fox M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Dec; 102(12):2642-7. PubMed ID: 17850412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.
Håkanson BS; Berggren P; Granqvist S; Ljungqvist O; Thorell A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.
Sweis R; Fox M; Anggiansah A; Wong T
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 May; 23(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 21235685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal thresholds and discriminatory power of 48-h wireless esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosisof GERD.
Wenner J; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 102(9):1862-9. PubMed ID: 17509034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy.
Zerbib F; Roman S; Ropert A; des Varannes SB; Pouderoux P; Chaput U; Mion F; Vérin E; Galmiche JP; Sifrim D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):1956-63. PubMed ID: 16848801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of dietary fat and calorie density on esophageal acid exposure and reflux symptoms.
Fox M; Barr C; Nolan S; Lomer M; Anggiansah A; Wong T
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 5(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 17363334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?
Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 17(6):378-81. PubMed ID: 18072019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient acceptance and clinical impact of Bravo monitoring in patients with previous failed catheter-based studies.
Sweis R; Fox M; Anggiansah R; Anggiansah A; Basavaraju K; Canavan R; Wong T
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Mar; 29(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 19183144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: defining the gold standard.
Madan K; Ahuja V; Gupta SD; Bal C; Kapoor A; Sharma MP
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2005 Jan; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 15610443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wireless pH recording immediately above the squamocolumnar junction improves the diagnostic performance of esophageal pH studies.
Wenner J; Hall M; Höglund P; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 103(12):2977-85. PubMed ID: 18786112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of esophageal pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.
Francavilla R; Magistà AM; Bucci N; Villirillo A; Boscarelli G; Mappa L; Leone G; Fico S; Castellaneta S; Indrio F; Lionetti E; Moramarco F; Cavallo L
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2010 Feb; 50(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 19680154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring.
Hirano I
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():12-24. PubMed ID: 16483266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
