BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17850669)

  • 21. Reliability of quality measures of movement in lumbar spine flexion-extension radiography.
    Taghipour-Darzi M; Ebrahimi-Takamjani E; Salavati M; Mobini B; Zekavat H
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2009; 22(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 20023344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of movement control tests for the neck, shoulder, thoracic, lumbar, and hip regions in military personnel.
    Tegern M; Aasa U; Äng BO; Harms-Ringdahl K; Larsson H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204552. PubMed ID: 30252903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Movement Control Impairment and Low Back Pain: State of the Art of Diagnostic Framing.
    Salvioli S; Pozzi A; Testa M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Aug; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31470684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests.
    Robinson HS; Mengshoel AM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):E270-5. PubMed ID: 24253798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intra and interrater reliability and clinical feasibility of a simple measure of cervical movement sense in patients with neck pain.
    Werner IM; Ernst MJ; Treleaven J; Crawford RJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Oct; 19(1):358. PubMed ID: 30290759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of neutral and target lumbar positioning tests in subjects with and without non-specific lower back pain.
    Reddy RS; Alahmari KA; Samuel PS; Tedla JS; Kakaraparthi VN; Rengaramanujam K
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2021; 34(2):289-299. PubMed ID: 33285625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter-examiner reliability of active combined movements assessment of subjects with a history of mechanical neck problems.
    Stamos I; Heneghan NR; McCarthy C; Wright C
    Man Ther; 2012 Oct; 17(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 22677716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
    Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
    Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interexaminer reliability of lumbar segmental mobility tests.
    Johansson F
    Man Ther; 2006 Nov; 11(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 16844402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Agreement between physiotherapists on quality of movement rated via videotape.
    Pomeroy VM; Pramanik A; Sykes L; Richards J; Hill E
    Clin Rehabil; 2003 May; 17(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 12735533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical screening tests for assessing movement control in non-specific low-back pain. A systematic review of intra- and inter-observer reliability studies.
    Carlsson H; Rasmussen-Barr E
    Man Ther; 2013 Apr; 18(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 23018080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The interrater reliability of physical examination tests that may predict the outcome or suggest the need for lumbar stabilization exercises.
    Rabin A; Shashua A; Pizem K; Dar G
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Feb; 43(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 23321848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting.
    Truter P; Russell T; Fary R
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Feb; 20(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 24283249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability and criterion validity of the "Gyroscope" application of the iPod™ for measuring lumbar range of motion.
    Boudreau N; Brochu FO; Dubreuil LM; Laurendeau T; Leblanc O; De Vette E; Tousignant-Laflamme Y
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 31658035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pain-related fear is associated with avoidance of spinal motion during recovery from low back pain.
    Thomas JS; France CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):E460-6. PubMed ID: 17632385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation.
    Reneman MF; Fokkens AS; Dijkstra PU; Geertzen JH; Groothoff JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):E40-6. PubMed ID: 15644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interrater reliability of judgments of the centralization phenomenon and status change during movement testing in patients with low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Delitto A; Vignovic M; Busse RG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 81(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10638877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A diagnostic classification for lumbar spine registry development.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Anderson PA; Resnick DK
    Spine J; 2011 Dec; 11(12):1108-16. PubMed ID: 22208855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.