These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17851286)

  • 1. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
    Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of stent size on the success of antegrade endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: results of 2 consecutive series.
    Danuser H; Hochreiter WW; Ackermann DK; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 11490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
    Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
    Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endopyelotomy review.
    Bernardo N; Smith AD
    Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution.
    Knudsen BE; Cook AJ; Watterson JD; Beiko DT; Nott L; Razvi H; Denstedt JD
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 14972459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.
    Danuser H; Ackermann DK; Böhlen D; Studer UE
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 9400436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Schenkman EM; Tarry WF
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Lojanapiwat B; Lertsupphakul B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Aug; 87(8):947-50. PubMed ID: 15471300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Faerber GJ; Ritchey ML; Bloom DA
    J Urol; 1995 Oct; 154(4):1495-7. PubMed ID: 7658575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
    Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
    Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience.
    Kim EH; Tanagho YS; Traxel EJ; Austin PF; Figenshau RS; Coplen DE
    J Urol; 2012 Oct; 188(4 Suppl):1628-33. PubMed ID: 22906656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.