189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17851892)
1. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-individual assessment of speech and music perception in cochlear implant users with contralateral Cochlear™ and MED-EL™ systems.
Harris RL; Gibson WP; Johnson M; Brew J; Bray M; Psarros C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1270-8. PubMed ID: 22074105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users.
Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Au DK; Kals M; Zierhofer C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Sep; 130(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 20141488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition outcomes in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with fine structure processing.
Qi B; Liu Z; Gu X; Liu B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 27701966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
