These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17851892)

  • 21. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
    Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification.
    Landwehr M; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23684531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies.
    Brockmeier SJ; Grasmeder M; Passow S; Mawmann D; Vischer M; Jappel A; Baumgartner W; Stark T; Müller J; Brill S; Steffens T; Strutz J; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Arnold W
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
    Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy.
    Vermeire K; Punte AK; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 20847579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Reiss S; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 19052929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Effects of temporal fine structure stimulation on Mandarin identification in cochlear implant users].
    Qi B; Liu B; Dong R; Krenmayr A; Chen X; Wang S
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 24931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fine Structure Processing improves speech perception as well as objective and subjective benefits in pediatric MED-EL COMBI 40+ users.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Obrycka A; Skarżynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 20933288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Pesch J; Vandali A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2249-63. PubMed ID: 18397030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Zerbi M; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 8588675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise.
    Franz BK; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    Am J Otol; 1987 Nov; 8(6):516-8. PubMed ID: 3434615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.