BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17851947)

  • 1. The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children.
    Steffens T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Strutz J; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Rühl S; Voss B; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17851947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants in children with sequential surgery.
    Strøm-Roum H; Laurent C; Wie OB
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 76(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 22075133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
    Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
    Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Chan JC; Freed DJ; Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):296-310. PubMed ID: 18569102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Scherf F; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Dhooge IJ; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 19451705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: development of the primary auditory abilities of bilateral stimulation.
    Sparreboom M; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 20980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Beijen JW; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 17473710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.