These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

764 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17852046)

  • 1. High resolution light microscopic evaluation of boar semen quality sperm cytoplasmic droplet retention in relationship with boar fertility parameters.
    Lovercamp KW; Safranski TJ; Fischer KA; Manandhar G; Sutovsky M; Herring W; Sutovsky P
    Arch Androl; 2007; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 17852046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase and ubiquitin as fertility markers in boars.
    Lovercamp KW; Safranski TJ; Fischer KA; Manandhar G; Sutovsky M; Herring W; Sutovsky P
    Theriogenology; 2007 Mar; 67(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17116325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thawing boar semen in the presence of seminal plasma: Effects on sperm quality and fertility.
    Garcia JC; Dominguez JC; Pena FJ; Alegre B; Gonzalez R; Castro MJ; Habing GG; Kirkwood RN
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 May; 119(1-2):160-5. PubMed ID: 19945234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
    Sutkeviciene N; Andersson MA; Zilinskas H; Andersson M
    Theriogenology; 2005 Feb; 63(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 15629793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.
    Alm K; Peltoniemi OA; Koskinen E; Andersson M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16689883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Šoštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):779-89. PubMed ID: 22064743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI.
    Waberski D; Schapmann E; Henning H; Riesenbeck A; Brandt H
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 20961609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility.
    Boe-Hansen GB; Christensen P; Vibjerg D; Nielsen MB; Hedeboe AM
    Theriogenology; 2008 Apr; 69(6):728-36. PubMed ID: 18242673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials.
    Holt C; Holt WV; Moore HD; Reed HC; Curnock RM
    J Androl; 1997; 18(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 9203061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of filtration through Sephadex columns improve overall quality parameters and "in vivo" fertility of subfertile refrigerated boar-semen.
    Ramió-Lluch L; Balasch S; Bonet S; Briz M; Pinart E; Rodríguez-Gil JE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Oct; 115(1-4):189-200. PubMed ID: 19157731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility.
    Ruiz-Sánchez AL; O'donoghue R; Novak S; Dyck MK; Cosgrove JR; Dixon WT; Foxcroft GR
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):736-48. PubMed ID: 16529803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an in vitro index to characterize fertilizing capacity of boar ejaculates.
    Schulze M; Ruediger K; Mueller K; Jung M; Well C; Reissmann M
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2013 Jul; 140(1-2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23773327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a high semen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm from ejaculates and from six epididymal regions in boars.
    Pruneda A; Pinart E; Dolors Briz M; Sancho S; Garcia-Gil N; Badia E; Kádár E; Bassols J; Bussalleu E; Yeste M; Bonet S
    Theriogenology; 2005 May; 63(8):2219-32. PubMed ID: 15826685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in quality and fertility of porcine semen.
    Tsakmakidis IA; Khalifa TA; Boscos CM
    Biol Res; 2012; 45(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 23558995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates.
    Wolf J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Apr; 44(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 19323799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of heterospermic inseminations and paternity testing to evaluate the relative contributions of common sperm traits and seminal plasma proteins in boar fertility.
    Flowers WL; Deller F; Stewart KR
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Nov; 174():123-131. PubMed ID: 27707521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses.
    Wolf J; Smital J
    J Anim Sci; 2009 May; 87(5):1620-7. PubMed ID: 19181771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate analyses for determining the association of field porcine fertility with sperm motion traits analysed by computer-assisted semen analysis and with sperm morphology.
    Kummer AB; Gaggini TS; Bernardi ML; McManus C; Gonçales EM; Wentz I; Bortolozzo FP
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2013 Oct; 48(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 23496757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors.
    Hirai M; Boersma A; Hoeflich A; Wolf E; Foll J; Aumüller TR; Braun J
    J Androl; 2001; 22(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 11191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.