215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17852303)
1. No advantages of Gamma nail over sliding hip screw in the management of peritrochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jiang SD; Jiang LS; Zhao CQ; Dai LY
Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(7):493-7. PubMed ID: 17852303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis.
Bhandari M; Schemitsch E; Jönsson A; Zlowodzki M; Haidukewych GJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Jul; 23(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 19550235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Postoperative implant-related complications after treatment of intertrochanteric fracture by gamma nail or by sliding hip screw: a meta-analysis].
Ding XF; Pei GX; Lin J; Wu TX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 88(33):2364-8. PubMed ID: 19087702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Shen L; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Cui Z
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 23707739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures by the use of gamma nail.
Ostojić Z; Moro G; Kvesić A; Roth S; Bekavac J; Manojlović S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():243-6. PubMed ID: 20402327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the trochanteric fixation nail and sliding hip screw.
Gill JB; Jensen L; Chin PC; Rafiei P; Reddy K; Schutt RC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007; 16(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 17592712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.
Liu M; Yang Z; Pei F; Huang F; Chen S; Xiang Z
Int Orthop; 2010 Mar; 34(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 19401825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000093. PubMed ID: 10796296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative prospective study of dynamic variable angle hip screw and Gamma nail in intertrochanteric hip fractures.
Tarantino U; Oliva F; Impagliazzo A; Mattei A; Cannata G; Pompili GF; Maffulli N
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15; 27(18-19):1157-65. PubMed ID: 16278185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison and presentation of technique and results of the gamma nail and dynamic hip screw].
Landolt M
Helv Chir Acta; 1993 Jun; 59(5-6):965-9. PubMed ID: 8376170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures. A randomized prospective controlled trial.
Bannister GC; Gibson AG; Ackroyd CE; Newman JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):242-6. PubMed ID: 2182255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More postoperative femoral fractures with the Gamma nail than the sliding screw plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures.
Osnes EK; Lofthus CM; Falch JA; Meyer HE; Stensvold I; Kristiansen IS; Nordsletten L
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Jun; 72(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 11480600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of the Gamma nail and sliding hip screw.
Mahomed N; Harrington I; Kellam J; Maistrelli G; Hearn T; Vroemen J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jul; (304):280-8. PubMed ID: 8020229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The stable internal fixation of peritrochanteric hip fractures.
Jarrett PJ; Fleming LL; Whitesides TE
Instr Course Lect; 1984; 33():203-18. PubMed ID: 6546102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
