These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17852668)

  • 1. Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents.
    Corder K; Brage S; Ramachandran A; Snehalatha C; Wareham N; Ekelund U
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Dec; 25(14):1607-11. PubMed ID: 17852668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
    Hänggi JM; Phillips LR; Rowlands AV
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerometer measured daily physical activity and sedentary pursuits--comparison between two models of the Actigraph and the importance of data reduction.
    Tanha T; Tornberg Å; Dencker M; Wollmer P
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 Oct; 6():439. PubMed ID: 24176143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth.
    Trost SG; Loprinzi PD; Moore R; Pfeiffer KA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jul; 43(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 21131873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.
    Vanhelst J; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuan G; Dieu O; Blondeau T; Fardy P; Béghin L
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions.
    Lee KY; Macfarlane DJ; Cerin E
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 23679150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers.
    Rothney MP; Apker GA; Song Y; Chen KY
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Oct; 105(4):1091-7. PubMed ID: 18635874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
    Sasaki JE; John D; Freedson PS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical activity among children: objective measurements using Fitbit One
    Hamari L; Kullberg T; Ruohonen J; Heinonen OJ; Díaz-Rodríguez N; Lilius J; Pakarinen A; Myllymäki A; Leppänen V; Salanterä S
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):161. PubMed ID: 28427441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry.
    Hagströmer M; Oja P; Sjöström M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1502-8. PubMed ID: 17805081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.
    Tanha T; Tornberg ÅB; Wollmer P; Dencker M
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 Mar; 33(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 23383695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph activity monitors under free-living conditions: do they provide comparable assessments of overall physical activity in 9-year old children?
    Grydeland M; Hansen BH; Ried-Larsen M; Kolle E; Anderssen SA
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2014; 6():26. PubMed ID: 25031839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accelerometers for measuring physical activity behavior in Indian children.
    Krishnaveni GV; Mills IC; Veena SR; Wootton SA; Wills AK; Coakley PJ; Fisher DJ; Shobha S; Karat SC; Fall CH
    Indian Pediatr; 2009 Dec; 46(12):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor.
    Ried-Larsen M; Brønd JC; Brage S; Hansen BH; Grydeland M; Andersen LB; Møller NC
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Sep; 9():113. PubMed ID: 22971175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary evidence of physical activity levels measured by accelerometer in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS Study.
    Martínez-Gómez D; Welk GJ; Calle ME; Marcos A; Veiga OL;
    Nutr Hosp; 2009; 24(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 19593496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
    Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers.
    Rothney MP; Schaefer EV; Neumann MM; Choi L; Chen KY
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2008 Aug; 16(8):1946-52. PubMed ID: 18535553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.
    McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment.
    Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children.
    Pulsford RM; Cortina-Borja M; Rich C; Kinnafick FE; Dezateux C; Griffiths LJ
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e21822. PubMed ID: 21853021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.