These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17852730)

  • 21. Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.
    Dahl LC; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 18810615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
    Clark SE; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
    Pickel KL
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sequential lineups: shift in criterion or decision strategy?
    Gronlund SD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 15065981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Navon letters affect face learning and face retrieval.
    Lewis MB; Mills C; Hills PJ; Weston N
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 19439398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bull R
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Aug; 94(Pt 3):339-54. PubMed ID: 14511547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cognitive science and the law.
    Busey TA; Loftus GR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiple independent identification decisions: a method of calibrating eyewitness identifications.
    Pryke S; Lindsay RC; Dysart JE; Dupuis P
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 14769121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.
    Greathouse SM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 18594956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eyewitness identification: information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors.
    Wells GL; Olson EA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Sep; 8(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 12240928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
    Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Appearance-change instruction effects on eyewitness lineup identification accuracy are not moderated by amount of appearance change.
    Molinaro PF; Arndorfer A; Charman SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 23855325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.