These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1785277)

  • 1. Comparison between Cytobrush and Papaplast in sampling vaginal smears.
    Hjersing M; Holm E; Larsson G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):595-9. PubMed ID: 1785277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
    Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 May; 41(346):192-3. PubMed ID: 1817471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different sampling devices on the presence of endocervical cells in cervical smears. A systematic literature review.
    Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA; André J; Crebolder HF; Essed GG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8130713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
    de Palo G; Stefanon B; Alasio L; Pilotti S
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of the cytobrush to determining cellular composition of cervical smears.
    Doornewaard H; van der Graaf Y
    J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 43(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 2370307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
    Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
    Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.