These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17852998)

  • 1. Critiques of the risk concept--valid or not?
    Nexøe J; Halvorsen PA; Kristiansen IS
    Scand J Public Health; 2007; 35(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 17852998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discounting and risk characteristics in clinical decision-making.
    Ortendahl M; Fries JF
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Mar; 12(3):RA41-5. PubMed ID: 16501432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' responsiveness to a decision support tool for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in primary care.
    van Steenkiste B; van der Weijden TM; Stoffers JH; GROL RP
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 18395393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informational needs and the experiences of women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears.
    Bertram CC; Magnussen L
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Sep; 20(9):455-62. PubMed ID: 18786022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does concern-driven risk management provide a viable alternative to QRA?
    Cox LA
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 17362398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: the feasibility and impact of cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in Australian general practice.
    Wan Q; Harris MF; Zwar N; Campbell T; Patel A; Vagholkar S; McKenzie S; Walker C; Denney-Wilson E;
    Am Heart J; 2009 Mar; 157(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 19249412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do heart failure specialist nurses think differently when faced with 'hard' or 'easy' decisions: a judgement analysis.
    Thompson C; Spilsbury K; Dowding D; Pattenden J; Brownlow R
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2174-84. PubMed ID: 18705737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shared decision-making in the context of menopausal health: where do we stand?
    Légaré F; Brouillette MH
    Maturitas; 2009 Jul; 63(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 19272720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.
    Edwards A; Prior L
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Nov; 47(424):739-42. PubMed ID: 9519524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concept analysis of adherence in the context of cardiovascular risk reduction.
    Cohen SM
    Nurs Forum; 2009; 44(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 19187051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The need for evolution in healthcare decision modeling.
    Lee RC; Donaldson C; Cook LS
    Med Care; 2003 Sep; 41(9):1024-33. PubMed ID: 12972842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GPs want tailored, user friendly evidence summaries--a cross sectional study in New South Wales.
    Trevena LJ; Irwig L; Isaacs A; Barratt A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1065-9. PubMed ID: 18075638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated electronic decision support increases cardiovascular disease risk assessment four fold in routine primary care practice.
    Wells S; Furness S; Rafter N; Horn E; Whittaker R; Stewart A; Moodabe K; Roseman P; Selak V; Bramley D; Jackson R
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 15(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 18391644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions.
    Politi MC; Han PK; Col NF
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):681-95. PubMed ID: 17873256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.
    Weiss MC; Peters TJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17942270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in general practice: mismatch between cardiovascular risk and patients' risk perceptions.
    van der Weijden T; van Steenkiste B; Stoffers HE; Timmermans DR; Grol R
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(6):754-61. PubMed ID: 17873263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the role of evidence in patients' evaluation of complementary therapies: a quality study.
    Verhoef MJ; Mulkins A; Carlson LE; Hilsden RJ; Kania A
    Integr Cancer Ther; 2007 Dec; 6(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18048882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in practice: a questionnaire survey of how congruence in attitudes between doctors and patients influences referral decisions.
    Carlsen B; Aakvik A; Norheim OF
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 18349435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.