These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory. Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning. Le Pelley ME; McLaren IP Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 12623538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory. Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Kornell N; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking. Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory. Booth SL; Buehner MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning. Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning. Beesley T; Le Pelley ME J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture. Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning. Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis. Undorf M; Erdfelder E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of instruction on learners' ability to generate an effective pathway in the method of loci. Massen C; Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B; Krings L; Hilbig BE Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):724-31. PubMed ID: 19575328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extinction in human learning and memory. Scully AL; Mitchell CJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 18609395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation. Hodgetts HM; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Halamish V; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]