BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17853198)

  • 1. Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: how positive congruency effects can be reversed.
    Ricciardelli P; Driver J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):491-504. PubMed ID: 17853198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipating intentional actions: the effect of eye gaze direction on the judgment of head rotation.
    Hudson M; Liu CH; Jellema T
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):423-34. PubMed ID: 19615675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relational property between head and eye regions is the primary determinant of the efficiency in search for a deviant gaze.
    Doi H; Ueda K; Shinohara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1723-37. PubMed ID: 19172532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.
    Holmes A; Mogg K; Garcia LM; Bradley BP
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 20162493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.
    Itier RJ; Villate C; Ryan JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 17064739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting the relationship between the processing of gaze direction and the processing of facial expression.
    Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 20718561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
    Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explicit versus implicit gaze processing assessed by ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Alain C; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1177():79-89. PubMed ID: 17916340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometrical basis of perception of gaze direction.
    Todorović D
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3549-62. PubMed ID: 16904157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.
    Langton SR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):825-45. PubMed ID: 10994231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.
    Vick SJ; Toxopeus I; Anderson JR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16962253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seen gaze-direction modulates fusiform activity and its coupling with other brain areas during face processing.
    George N; Driver J; Dolan RJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1102-12. PubMed ID: 11352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical processing of head- and eye-gaze cues guiding joint social attention.
    Laube I; Kamphuis S; Dicke PW; Thier P
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1643-53. PubMed ID: 20832481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human MT/V5 activity on viewing eye gaze changes in others: A magnetoencephalographic study.
    Watanabe S; Kakigi R; Miki K; Puce A
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 16684514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaze perception requires focused attention: evidence from an interference task.
    Burton AM; Bindemann M; Langton SR; Schweinberger SR; Jenkins R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 19170474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal facilitation of gaze in the presence of postural reactions triggered by sudden surface perturbations.
    Paquette C; Fung J
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(2):505-19. PubMed ID: 17258863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the perception of monocular and binocular gaze.
    West RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 87(2):E112-9. PubMed ID: 20035243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related declines in basic social perception: evidence from tasks assessing eye-gaze processing.
    Slessor G; Phillips LH; Bull R
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Dec; 23(4):812-22. PubMed ID: 19140652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.