205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17853225)
1. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Array training in a categorization task.
Homa D; Powell D; Ferguson R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 23713978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential impact of posterior lesions in the left and right hemisphere on visual category learning and generalization to contrast reversal.
Langguth B; Jüttner M; Landis T; Regard M; Rentschler I
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2927-36. PubMed ID: 19573546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
Smith JD; Minda JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prototype-distortion category learning: a two-phase learning process across a distributed network.
Little DM; Thulborn KR
Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 16406637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees.
Stach S; Giurfa M
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 161(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 15904705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief communication: the role of category structure in determining the effects of stimulus preexposure on categorization accuracy.
Wills AJ; Suret M; McLaren IP
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 14690850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
Minda JP; Smith JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tests enhance the transfer of learning.
Rohrer D; Taylor K; Sholar B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 20053059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus).
Hanggi EB; Ingersoll JF
Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 19148689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bogus concerns about the false prototype enhancement effect.
Homa D; Hout MC; Milliken L; Milliken AM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 21261424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Instance memorization and category influence: challenging the evidence for multiple systems in category learning.
Johansen MK; Fouquet N; Savage J; Shanks DR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1204-26. PubMed ID: 23140443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
Sutton JE; Roberts WA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
