These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17853232)

  • 1. Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception.
    Angeli A; Davidoff J; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):690-707. PubMed ID: 17853232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces. The effect of covert and overt face learning.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 20483817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.
    Armann R; Bülthoff I
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():69-80. PubMed ID: 22595743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Broadly tuned face representation in older adults assessed by categorical perception.
    Lee Y; Smith CR; Grady CL; Hoang N; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1060-71. PubMed ID: 24490946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face-selective regions other than the fusiform face area.
    Ramon M; Dricot L; Rossion B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1587-98. PubMed ID: 20880360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.
    Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15963384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of impaired facial affect recognition with basic facial and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.
    Norton D; McBain R; Holt DJ; Ongur D; Chen Y
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 65(12):1094-8. PubMed ID: 19268917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles.
    Lander K; Chuang L; Wickham L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):801-8. PubMed ID: 16608747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical perception of faces and facial expressions: the age factor.
    Kiffel C; Campanella S; Bruyer R
    Exp Aging Res; 2005; 31(2):119-47. PubMed ID: 15981793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces.
    de Fockert J; Wolfenstein C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1716-22. PubMed ID: 19382009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of face similarity in the case of the perception of morphed self-face.
    Yoon HW; Kircher TT
    Int J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 115(6):839-49. PubMed ID: 16019577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Center-surround organization of face-space: evidence from contrast-based face-priming.
    Rostamirad S; Barton JJ; Oruç I
    Neuroreport; 2009 Aug; 20(13):1177-82. PubMed ID: 19597376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Females excel at basic face perception.
    McBain R; Norton D; Chen Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19159861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
    Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.