422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854052)
1. A hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach to evaluate clinical trial designs for tests of superiority and non-inferiority.
Shao Y; Mukhi V; Goldberg JD
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):504-19. PubMed ID: 17854052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A framework for two-stage adaptive procedures to simultaneously test non-inferiority and superiority.
Koyama T; Sampson AR; Gleser LJ
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2439-56. PubMed ID: 15977285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.
Johnson VE; Cook JD
Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal choice of the number of treatments to be included in a clinical trial.
Stallard N; Posch M; Friede T; Koenig F; Brannath W
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1321-38. PubMed ID: 19243083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian sample size determination in non-sequential clinical trials: Statistical aspects and some regulatory considerations.
Grouin JM; Coste M; Bunouf P; Lecoutre B
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4914-24. PubMed ID: 17559054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.
Kikuchi T; Gittins J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 20223784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
Daimon T
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
Hirotsu C
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing non-inferiority: a combination approach.
Gao P; Ware JH
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 17575568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
Chang M
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some thoughts on sample size: a Bayesian-frequentist hybrid approach.
Gordon Lan KK; Wittes JT
Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 22865839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A seamless phase II/III design with sample-size re-estimation.
Bischoff W; Miller F
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 20183428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible design of two-stage adaptive procedures for phase III clinical trials.
Koyama T
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 17307399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
