513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854083)
1. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of imprint cytology for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer.
Motomura K; Nagumo S; Komoike Y; Koyama H; Inaji H
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):839-42. PubMed ID: 18438122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of touch imprint cytology and Mohs frozen-section histology in the evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgical margins.
Florell SR; Layfield LJ; Gerwels JW
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Apr; 44(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 11260543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.
Gal R
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):838-9. PubMed ID: 3059734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative assessment of excision margins using breast imprint and scrape cytology.
Muttalib M; Tai CC; Briant-Evans T; Maheswaran I; Livni N; Shousha S; Sinnett HD
Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15695080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative imprint evaluation of surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Yadav GS; Donoghue M; Tauro DP; Yadav A; Agarwal S
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23221361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node in the assessment of axillary node status in breast carcinoma.
Ravichandran D; Kocjan G; Falzon M; Ball RY; Ralphs DN
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 15028302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
