These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854333)

  • 1. Analysis of binary outcomes with missing data: missing = smoking, last observation carried forward, and a little multiple imputation.
    Hedeker D; Mermelstein RJ; Demirtas H
    Addiction; 2007 Oct; 102(10):1564-73. PubMed ID: 17854333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing missing data assumptions in longitudinal studies: an example using a smoking cessation trial.
    Yang X; Shoptaw S
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Mar; 77(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 15734221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general method for handling missing binary outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
    Jackson D; White IR; Mason D; Sutton S
    Addiction; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1986-93. PubMed ID: 25171441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Missing=Smoking Assumption: A Fallacy in Internet-Based Smoking Cessation Trials?
    Blankers M; Smit ES; van der Pol P; de Vries H; Hoving C; van Laar M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25744969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of self-report and biochemically verified tobacco abstinence outcomes with missing data: a sensitivity analysis using two-stage imputation.
    Zhang Y; Luo X; Le CT; Ahluwalia JS; Thomas JL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):170. PubMed ID: 30563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fallacies of last observation carried forward analyses.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 26400875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing and LOCF imputed outcomes in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Salanti G; Furukawa TA; Cipriani A; Chaimani A; White IR
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(5):720-737. PubMed ID: 30347460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why assigning ongoing tobacco use is not necessarily a conservative approach to handling missing tobacco cessation outcomes.
    Nelson DB; Partin MR; Fu SS; Joseph AM; An LC
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Jan; 11(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 19246444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on LOCF imputation.
    Cook RJ; Zeng L; Yi GY
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):820-8. PubMed ID: 15339307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missing data assumptions and methods in a smoking cessation study.
    Barnes SA; Larsen MD; Schroeder D; Hanson A; Decker PA
    Addiction; 2010 Mar; 105(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 20402986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Acute Stroke Trials: Advantages of Multiple Imputation Using Baseline and Postbaseline Variables.
    Young-Saver DF; Gornbein J; Starkman S; Saver JL
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 30297167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 23321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-help interventions for smoking cessation.
    Lancaster T; Stead LF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jul; (3):CD001118. PubMed ID: 16034855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binary variable multiple-model multiple imputation to address missing data mechanism uncertainty: application to a smoking cessation trial.
    Siddique J; Harel O; Crespi CM; Hedeker D
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):3013-28. PubMed ID: 24634315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dealing with missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 30991455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-help interventions for smoking cessation.
    Lancaster T; Stead LF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD001118. PubMed ID: 12137618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trajectories of cigarettes per day during the course of telephone tobacco cessation counseling services: a comparison of missing data models.
    Witkiewitz K; Bush T; Magnusson LB; Carlini BH; Zbikowski SM
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2012 Sep; 14(9):1100-4. PubMed ID: 22180594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of nonresponse patterns in the analysis of smoking cessation trials.
    Twardella D; Brenner H
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2008 May; 10(5):891-6. PubMed ID: 18569764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.