266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854508)
1. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study.
Harrysson OL; Hosni YA; Nayfeh JF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Sep; 8():91. PubMed ID: 17854508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.
Huang CH; Hsu LI; Chang TK; Chuang TY; Shih SL; Lu YC; Chen CS; Huang CH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jan; 25(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 25539687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A genetic algorithm based multi-objective shape optimization scheme for cementless femoral implant.
Chanda S; Gupta S; Kumar Pratihar D
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Mar; 137(3):. PubMed ID: 25392855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probability of mechanical loosening of the femoral component in high flexion total knee arthroplasty can be reduced by rather simple surgical techniques.
van de Groes S; de Waal-Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23731496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the distal femoral resection angle on the principal stresses in ceramic total knee components.
Kluess D; Bergschmidt P; Mueller I; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):846-50. PubMed ID: 22542212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Day JS; Kurtz SM; Field RE; Manley MT
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18823747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrated CAD/CAM/robotic milling method for custom cementless femoral prostheses.
Wen-ming X; Ai-min W; Qi W; Chang-hua L; Jian-fei Z; Fang-fang X
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):911-5. PubMed ID: 26210779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock.
Barink M; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 14558644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational modelling of motion at the bone-implant interface after total knee arthroplasty: The role of implant design and surgical fit.
Conlisk N; Howie CR; Pankaj P
Knee; 2017 Oct; 24(5):994-1005. PubMed ID: 28778499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact stresses in a patient-specific unicompartmental knee replacement.
Van Den Heever DJ; Scheffer C; Erasmus PJ; Dillon EM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5113-6. PubMed ID: 21095805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dynamic model of simulating stress distribution in the distal femur after total knee replacement.
Shi JF; Wang CJ; Laoui T; Hart W; Hall R
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Nov; 221(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 18161250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A
Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Topological optimization in hip prosthesis design.
Fraldi M; Esposito L; Perrella G; Cutolo A; Cowin SC
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Aug; 9(4):389-402. PubMed ID: 20037769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of stemmed and nonstemmed hip replacement on stress distribution of proximal femur and implant.
Chen CM; Tsai WC; Lin SC; Tseng CS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Sep; 15():312. PubMed ID: 25257699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Total knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific instruments and implants].
Steinert AF; Holzapfel BM; Sefrin L; Arnholdt J; Hoberg M; Rudert M
Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27025870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid prototyping technique in the preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty with custom femoral components.
Faur C; Crainic N; Sticlaru C; Oancea C
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2013 Mar; 125(5-6):144-9. PubMed ID: 23508872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
