BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854627)

  • 1. Telescoping implant prostheses with intraoral luted galvano mesostructures to improve passive fit.
    Greven B; Luepke M; von Dorsche SH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 17854627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral luting: modified prosthetic design to achieve passivity, precision of fit, and esthetics for a cement-retained, implant-supported metal-resin-fixed complete denture.
    Longoni S; Sartori M; Maroni I; Baldoni M
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 19895428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral framework pick-up technique to improve fit of a metal-resin implant prosthesis.
    Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):435-6. PubMed ID: 23059598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
    Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement-retained superstructure for a metal-resin fixed complete denture.
    McCracken M; Simmons B; Simmons W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 15775933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fabrication of a fixed retrievable implant-supported prosthesis based on electroforming: a technical report.
    Nelson K; Hildebrand D; Mehrhof J
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):591-5. PubMed ID: 18761573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Telescopic prostheses for implants.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 9638005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.
    Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 14982352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new prosthodontic technique for fabricating cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
    Wat PY; Pow EH; Chow TW
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11203924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternate treatment method for a fixed-detachable hybrid prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Cobb GW; Metcalf AM; Parsell D; Reeves GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 12644797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses.
    Drago C; Howell K
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):413-24. PubMed ID: 22413997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Rationale for a fixed implant-supported transitional prosthesis in full-arch implant restorations].
    Leclercq P; Dohan DM
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2007 Dec; 108(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 17889090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
    Duyck J; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary zirconia implant fixed partial dentures opposing an acrylic resin implant fixed complete denture: a two-year clinical report.
    Chang PP; Henegbarth EA; Lang LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 17618914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative complete-arch cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial denture.
    Hofstede TM; Ercoli C; Hagan ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jul; 82(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 10384169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses.
    Gervais MJ; Hatzipanagiotis P; Wilson PR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 18304245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prototype provisional restorations for implant-supported, full-mouth, metal-ceramic reconstructions: the hybrid technique.
    Mitrani R; Phillips K; Escudero F
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):807-14; quiz 816. PubMed ID: 14969218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.