127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17854795)
1. Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Osman O; Uçan ON; Tunaci M; Dursun M
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 17854795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved lesion detection in MR mammography: three-dimensional segmentation, moving voxel sampling, and normalized maximum intensity-time ratio entropy.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 17236988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A preliminary study on computerized lesion localization in MR mammography using 3D nMITR maps, multilayer cellular neural networks, and fuzzy c-partitioning.
Ertas G; Gulcur HO; Tunaci M; Osman O; Ucan ON
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 18293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a fully automatic lesion detection system for breast DCE-MRI.
Vignati A; Giannini V; De Luca M; Morra L; Persano D; Carbonaro LA; Bertotto I; Martincich L; Regge D; Bert A; Sardanelli F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1341-51. PubMed ID: 21965159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noncontrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance aortography of the thorax at 3.0 T using respiratory-compensated T1-weighted k-space segmented gradient-echo imaging with radial data sampling: preliminary study.
Amano Y; Takahama K; Kumita S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):548-52. PubMed ID: 19652612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Self-organizing neural networks for automatic detection and classification of contrast (media) enhancement of lesions in dynamic MR-mammography].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Kauczor HU; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Schreiber WG; Heitmann KR; Beier T; Thelen M
Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):703-13. PubMed ID: 15871086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interactive dynamic analysis and decision support software for MR mammography.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 18343634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms.
Ng EY; Fok SC; Peh YC; Ng FC; Sim LS
J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(4):152-7. PubMed ID: 12396330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
