232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17855207)
1. Renal function after port access and median sternotomy mitral valve surgery.
Antonic M; Gersak B
Heart Surg Forum; 2007; 10(5):E401-7. PubMed ID: 17855207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison.
Svensson LG; Atik FA; Cosgrove DM; Blackstone EH; Rajeswaran J; Krishnaswamy G; Jin U; Gillinov AM; Griffin B; Navia JL; Mihaljevic T; Lytle BW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):926-32.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19945121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery?
Richardson L; Richardson M; Hunter S
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 7(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 18407961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study.
Dogan S; Aybek T; Risteski PS; Detho F; Rapp A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Moritz A
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 79(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 15680822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery.
Valdez GD; Mihos CG; Santana O; Heimowitz TB; Goldszer R; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 146(6):1488-93. PubMed ID: 23972261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mitral valve surgery and acute renal injury: port access versus median sternotomy.
McCreath BJ; Swaminathan M; Booth JV; Phillips-Bute B; Chew ST; Glower DD; Stafford-Smith M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 75(3):812-9. PubMed ID: 12645699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting the dome approach for partial sternotomy/minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
Little S; Flynn M; Pettersson GB; Gillinov AM; Blackstone EH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):694-7. PubMed ID: 19231372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Video-assisted mitral surgery through a micro-access: a safe and reliable reality in the current era.
Greco E; Zaballos JM; Alvarez L; Urso S; Pulitani I; Sàdaba R; Juaristi A; Goiti JJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jan; 17(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 18365569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five years of less invasive mitral valve surgery: from experimental to routine approach.
Onnasch JF; Schneider F; Falk V; Mierzwa M; Bucerius J; Mohr FW
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 12125665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reoperative mitral valve surgery by the port access minithoracotomy approach is safe and effective.
Meyer SR; Szeto WY; Augoustides JG; Morris RJ; Vernick WJ; Paschal D; Fox J; Hargrove WC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1426-30. PubMed ID: 19379880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of port access to sternotomy in tricuspid or mitral/tricuspid operations.
Tripp HF; Glower DD; Lowe JE; Wolfe WG
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 12125666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute renal failure after cardiac surgery: evaluation of the RIFLE classification.
Kuitunen A; Vento A; Suojaranta-Ylinen R; Pettilä V
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 81(2):542-6. PubMed ID: 16427848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. eComment: Port-access mitral valve repair in re-do surgery.
Gaeta R; Tancredi F; Monaco F; Lentini S
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 7(4):683. PubMed ID: 18664672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery.
Santana O; Reyna J; Grana R; Buendia M; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Feb; 91(2):406-10. PubMed ID: 21256280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors profile for acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery is different according to the level of baseline renal function.
Lombardi R; Ferreiro A
Ren Fail; 2008; 30(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 18300114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery with a partial sternotomy "J" approach.
Svensson LG
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007; 19(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 18395628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy.
Wang D; Wang Q; Yang X; Wu Q; Li Q
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):704-8. PubMed ID: 19231374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients greater than 70 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.
Holzhey DM; Shi W; Borger MA; Seeburger J; Garbade J; Pfannmüller B; Mohr FW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Feb; 91(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 21256279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of mitral valve repair: median sternotomy versus port-access approach.
Raanani E; Spiegelstein D; Sternik L; Preisman S; Moshkovitz Y; Smolinsky AK; Shinfeld A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19969315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients.
Grossi EA; Zakow PK; Ribakove G; Kallenbach K; Ursomanno P; Gradek CE; Baumann FG; Colvin SB; Galloway AC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S39-42. PubMed ID: 10613554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
