These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1786335)

  • 1. Testing for random dropouts in repeated measurement data.
    Ridout MS
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1617-9; discussion 1619-21. PubMed ID: 1786335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using projection for testing goodness-of-fit in regression models for repeated measures.
    Qu RP; Palta M
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1259-67. PubMed ID: 8962453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
    Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interpretation of a regression coefficient.
    Galbraith JI
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1593-5; discussion 1595-6. PubMed ID: 1786332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyzing multi-environment variety trials using randomization-derived mixed models.
    Caliński T; Czajka S; Kaczmarek Z; Krajewski P; Pilarczyk W
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 16011691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two random effects models for multivariate binary data.
    McDonald BW
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 8086599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian approach to a logistic regression model with incomplete information.
    Choi T; Schervish MJ; Schmitt KA; Small MJ
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 17764482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self modeling with flexible, random time transformations.
    Brumback LC; Lindstrom MJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 15180672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An application of maximum likelihood and generalized estimating equations to the analysis of ordinal data from a longitudinal study with cases missing at random.
    Kenward MG; Lesaffre E; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):945-53. PubMed ID: 7787007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intention-to-treat analyses for incomplete repeated measures data.
    Hogan JW; Laird NM
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1002-17. PubMed ID: 8805765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regression analysis with missing covariate data using estimating equations.
    Zhao LP; Lipsitz S; Lew D
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1165-82. PubMed ID: 8962448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact two-sample inference with missing data.
    Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):524-31. PubMed ID: 16011700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing bivariate repeated measures for discrete and continuous outcome variables.
    Rochon J
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):740-50. PubMed ID: 8672710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratified testing for treatment effects with missing data.
    Shih WJ; Quan H
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):782-7. PubMed ID: 9660633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian framework for intent-to-treat analysis with missing data.
    Kleinman KP; Ibrahim JG; Laird NM
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):265-78. PubMed ID: 9544521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Pulkstenis EP; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):367-83. PubMed ID: 9544529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginalized models for moderate to long series of longitudinal binary response data.
    Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 17688485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample-size requirements for comparisons of two groups on repeated observations of a binary outcome.
    Leon AC
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 14994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parameter estimation from incomplete data in binomial regression when the missing data mechanism is nonignorable.
    Ibrahim JG; Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1071-8. PubMed ID: 8805768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A goodness-of-fit test for multinomial logistic regression.
    Goeman JJ; le Cessie S
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):980-5. PubMed ID: 17156271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.