These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17863570)

  • 1. THE ELEMENT OF ERROR IN ABDOMINAL DIAGNOSIS.
    Foss HL
    Ann Surg; 1916 Jul; 64(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17863570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method for aortic wall strain measurement with three-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking and fitted finite element analysis.
    Karatolios K; Wittek A; Nwe TH; Bihari P; Shelke A; Josef D; Schmitz-Rixen T; Geks J; Maisch B; Blase C; Moosdorf R; Vogt S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 96(5):1664-71. PubMed ID: 23998405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysms: A realistic assessment of the explicit GPU approach.
    Strbac V; Pierce DM; Rodriguez-Vila B; Vander Sloten J; Famaey N
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 56():1-9. PubMed ID: 28318603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns of diagnostic error in trauma abdominal CT.
    West OC; Anderson J; Lee JS; Finnell CW; Raval BK
    Emerg Radiol; 2002 Oct; 9(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 15290562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall.
    Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Melero H; Pascual G; Doblaré M; Ginebra MP; Bellón JM; Calvo B
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3905-13. PubMed ID: 21763794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Acute abdominal pain in diabetic ketoacidosis, the possible cause of diagnostic error. Review of 3 clinical cases].
    Russo A
    Minerva Med; 1987 Oct; 78(19):1449-51. PubMed ID: 3118253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Päivänsalo M; Lähde S; Myllylä V; Leinonen A
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):683-5. PubMed ID: 6429784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MO-F-BRA-04: Voxel-Based Statistical Analysis of Deformable Image Registration Error via a Finite Element Method.
    Li S; Lu M; Kim J; Glide-Hurst C; Chetty I; Zhong H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3875. PubMed ID: 28518241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element and photoelastic modelling of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.
    Callanan A; Morris LG; McGloughlin TM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1111-9. PubMed ID: 21660780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-Time Error Control for Surgical Simulation.
    Bui HP; Tomar S; Courtecuisse H; Cotin S; Bordas SPA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Mar; 65(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 28541192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain.
    Mannion AF; Pulkovski N; Gubler D; Gorelick M; O'Riordan D; Loupas T; Schenk P; Gerber H; Sprott H
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Apr; 17(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 18196294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: predicted rupture risk correlates with aortic wall histology in individual patients.
    Erhart P; Grond-Ginsbach C; Hakimi M; Lasitschka F; Dihlmann S; Böckler D; Hyhlik-Dürr A
    J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Aug; 21(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 25101586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confined housing system increased abdominal and subcutaneous fat deposition and gene expressions of carbohydrate response element-binding protein and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 in chicken.
    Li Q; Zhao XL; Gilbert ER; Liu YP; Wang Y; Qiu MH; Zhu Q
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Feb; 14(1):1220-8. PubMed ID: 25730060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Lu J; Zhou X; Raghavan ML
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 16542663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of scan errors in the three-element Risley prism pair.
    Li A; Gong W; Zhang Y; Liu X
    Opt Express; 2018 Sep; 26(19):25322-25335. PubMed ID: 30469635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human liver finite element model validation using compressive and tensile experimental data - biomed 2013.
    Davis ML; Moreno DP; Vavalle NA; Gayzik FS
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2013; 49():289-96. PubMed ID: 23686212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and in vitro evaluation of a real-time catheter localization system using time of flight measurements from seven 3.5 MHz single element ultrasound transducers towards abdominal aortic aneurysm procedures.
    Mung J; Han S; Yen JT
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 21524775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary intraobserver and interobserver variability in wall stress and rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using a semiautomatic finite element model.
    Teutelink A; Cancrinus E; van de Heuvel D; Moll F; de Vries JP
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 55(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 22104340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Main causes of error in the diagnosis of closed abdominal injuries].
    Pashkevich VI
    Voen Med Zh; 1983 Jun; (6):55-7. PubMed ID: 6613054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element simulation of the insertion of guidewires during an EVAR procedure: example of a complex patient case, a first step toward patient-specific parameterized models.
    Gindre J; Bel-Brunon A; Kaladji A; Duménil A; Rochette M; Lucas A; Haigron P; Combescure A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Jul; 31(7):e02716. PubMed ID: 25820933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.