These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17867337)

  • 21. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
    Liu W; Li X; Tang D
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Usefulness of the pulse oximetry in diagnosis of fetal distress during labor].
    Tomala J; Sikora J; Chromy G; Kobielska L; Machalski T; Magnucki J; Kiecka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Aug; 71(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 11082953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Cardiotocographic correlation of the variable decelerations due to cord wrapping].
    Topete Toledo LG; García Necoechea MP; Jimenéz Perea ML; Ahued Ahued JR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1987 Nov; 55():290-4. PubMed ID: 3154213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of STAN S21 fetal heart monitor by medical staff.
    Rault S; Vayssiere C; Roth E; David E; Favre R; Langer B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 102(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18378238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
    Goeschen K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
    Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Sinusoidal heart rate].
    Halberstadt E; Born HJ; Schroyens E
    Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 7926958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
    Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part I)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 18510054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Doppler velocimetry and nonstress test for predicting outcome of pregnancies with decreased fetal movements.
    Dubiel M; Gudmundsson S; Thuring-Jönsson A; Maesel A; Marsal K
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 9259915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part II)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18510096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part III)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 18592859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part I). Too short monitoring].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Apr; 79(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 18592871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Silent uterine rupture in cardiotocography].
    Klein M; Rosen A; Beck A
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1988; 28 Suppl 2():240-3. PubMed ID: 3234928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The antenatal CTG.
    Andrews S
    Pract Midwife; 2002 Oct; 5(9):18-20. PubMed ID: 12400409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial.
    Impey L; Reynolds M; MacQuillan K; Gates S; Murphy J; Sheil O
    Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9356):465-70. PubMed ID: 12583945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: an update.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 24(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 22249147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management.
    Quintero R; Meyers S; Schifrin B
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):617; author reply 617-8. PubMed ID: 12636972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Case report 8. Management of the first labor stage in a heart patient without CTG monitoring and without the presence of a physician].
    Ceska Gynekol; 1995 Dec; 60(6):315-6. PubMed ID: 8599716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.