These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17867350)

  • 1. Estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity with a spectral multidip approach.
    Farina D; Negro F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1583-9. PubMed ID: 17867350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals.
    Farina D; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Dec; 50(12):1340-51. PubMed ID: 14656063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings.
    Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 15003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.
    Farina D; Pozzo M; Merlo E; Bottin A; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1383-93. PubMed ID: 15311823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor unit conduction velocity distribution estimation from evoked motor responses.
    Ledoux I; García-González MT; Duchêne J; Hogrel JY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):608-16. PubMed ID: 16602567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A technique to track individual motor unit action potentials in surface EMG by monitoring their conduction velocities and amplitudes.
    Beck RB; Houtman CJ; O'Malley MJ; Lowery MM; Stegeman DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 15825864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from simulated surface EMG in pinnate muscles.
    Mesin L; Damiano L; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 160(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 17070925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conduction velocity of quiescent muscle fibers decreases during sustained contraction.
    Gazzoni M; Camelia F; Farina D
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):387-94. PubMed ID: 15703224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind separation of linear instantaneous mixtures of nonstationary surface myoelectric signals.
    Farina D; Févotte C; Doncarli C; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1555-67. PubMed ID: 15376504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of measurement of muscle fiber conduction velocity using surface EMG.
    Harba MI; Teng LY
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 10354908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions.
    Farina D; Falla D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials.
    Schulte E; Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV; Rau G; Disselhorst-Klug C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 15763676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-frequency analysis and estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during explosive dynamic contractions.
    Merlo E; Pozzo M; Antonutto G; di Prampero PE; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 15698666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can standard surface EMG processing parameters be used to estimate motor unit global firing rate?
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Jun; 1(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 15876628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of high motor unit synchronization levels on non-linear and spectral variables of the surface EMG.
    Fattorini L; Felici F; Filligoi GC; Traballesi M; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Apr; 143(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15814145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of innervation-zone distribution on estimates of average muscle-fiber conduction velocity.
    Nielsen M; Graven-Nielsen T; Farina D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jan; 37(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 17912748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial and temporal changes of upper trapezius muscle fiber conduction velocity are not predicted by surface EMG spectral analysis during a dynamic upper limb task.
    Falla D; Graven-Nielsen T; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Sep; 156(1-2):236-41. PubMed ID: 16621005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A surface EMG generation model with multilayer cylindrical description of the volume conductor.
    Farina D; Mesin L; Martina S; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 15000373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.