BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17870528)

  • 1. In pursuit of defining clinical relevance of positive patch tests results.
    Wolf R; Davidovici B; Stone SP; Tuzun Y
    Clin Dermatol; 2007; 25(5):493-4. PubMed ID: 17870528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenging the classification of clinical relevance of positive patch tests results in allergic contact dermatitis: a report on an infant.
    Wolf R; Wolf D; Stone SP; Davidovici B
    Int J Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 47(11):1193-4. PubMed ID: 18986459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
    Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epicutaneous patch testing.
    Devos SA; Van Der Valk PG
    Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 12370148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations.
    Khamaysi Z; Bergman R; Weltfriend S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Oct; 55(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16958919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
    Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
    Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 59(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18597890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allergic contact dermatitis from oleyl alcohol in Elidel cream.
    Andersen KE; Broesby-Olsen S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 17101011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patch testing with a standard allergen ("screening") tray: rewards and risks.
    Belsito DV
    Dermatol Ther; 2004; 17(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 15186369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendation to include methyldibromo glutaronitrile in the European standard patch test series.
    Bruze M; Goossens A; Gruvberger B; ;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 15701126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18154557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients with vulval pruritus: patch test results.
    Utaş S; Ferahbaş A; Yildiz S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 May; 58(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 18416761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allergy to tea tree oil: retrospective review of 41 cases with positive patch tests over 4.5 years.
    Rutherford T; Nixon R; Tam M; Tate B
    Australas J Dermatol; 2007 May; 48(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 17535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relevance of patch testing in peristomal dermatitis.
    Al-Niaimi F; Beck M; Almaani N; Samarasinghe V; Williams J; Lyon C
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Jul; 167(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 22385096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis.
    Schena D; Fantuzzi F; Girolomoni G
    Eur J Dermatol; 2008; 18(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 18955202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde releasers indicating contact allergy to formaldehyde.
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Hellriegel S; Fuchs T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 18279163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, the role of spices and flavour allergy.
    Vermaat H; Smienk F; Rustemeyer T; Bruynzeel DP; Kirtschig G
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18844699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series.
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Becker D; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Jappe U; Koch P; Pföhler C; Skudlik C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):322-9. PubMed ID: 17101005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.