135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17873155)
1. Comparison of the split stacked versus the split achilles allograft for dual femoral tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
DeBerardino TM; Lonergan KT; Brooks DE
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 17873155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An anatomical and biomechanical comparison of anteromedial and anterolateral approaches for tibial tunnel of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the widening effect of the anterolateral approach.
Ahn JH; Bae JH; Lee YS; Choi K; Bae TS; Wang JH
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):1777-83. PubMed ID: 19470944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An experimental study of split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in single femoral tunnel].
Tao C; Wang W; He A
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 21(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 17882876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament allograft tendons: comparison of 1-, 2-, and 4-stranded constructs.
Park DK; Fogel HA; Bhatia S; Bach BR; Gupta A; Shewman EF; Wang V; Verma N; Provencher MT
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 19460814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Ahn JH; Yoo JC; Wang JH
Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16084294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Arthroscopic simultaneous reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament using double femoral tunnel technique and anterior cruciate ligament with achilles allograft].
Shao DC; Chen BC; Gao SJ; Wang XF; Sun R
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 46(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 18509963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using tibial-inlay and double-bundle technique.
Kim SJ; Park IS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1271. PubMed ID: 16226662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Torrie A; Hecker A; Sekiya JK
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17554103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Margheritini F; Rihn JA; Mauro CS; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1164-71. PubMed ID: 16226642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft].
Shao D; Chen B; Gao S; Sun R; Li H; Yan C
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 20187461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of anteromedial versus anterolateral tibial tunnel direction for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2 to 8 years' follow-up.
Kim SJ; Chang JH; Kang YH; Song DH; Park KY
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):693-8. PubMed ID: 19336619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tunnel volume enlargement after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of achilles allograft with mixed autograft/allograft--a prospective computed tomography study.
Kwon JH; Han JH; Jo DY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Bhandare N; Suh DW; Nha KW
Arthroscopy; 2014 Mar; 30(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 24581257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary stability of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures: a biomechanical in vitro study.
Kitamura N; Yasuda K; Tohyama H; Yamanaka M; Tanabe Y
Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):970-8. PubMed ID: 16084295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Achilles tendon allograft, double bundle.
Heinzelmann AD; Barrett GR
Clin Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 28(2):245-57, viii. PubMed ID: 19306733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
Kim SJ; Choi CH; Kim HS
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jul; 20 Suppl 2():149-54. PubMed ID: 15243450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.
Zantop T; Diermann N; Schumacher T; Schanz S; Fu FH; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 18296542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Replication of the range of native anterior cruciate ligament fiber length change behavior achieved by different grafts: measurement using computer-assisted navigation.
Robinson J; Stanford FC; Kendoff D; Stüber V; Pearle AD
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):1406-11. PubMed ID: 19369575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: a mechanical comparison.
Sasaki SU; da Mota e Albuquerque RF; Amatuzzi MM; Pereira CA
Arthroscopy; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1226-30. PubMed ID: 17986411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
