These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Effect of planar microelectrode geometry on neuron stimulation: finite element modeling and experimental validation of the efficient electrode shape. Ghazavi A; Westwick D; Xu F; Wijdenes P; Syed N; Dalton C J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jun; 248():51-8. PubMed ID: 25845480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of selected stimulus waveforms on pulse and phase characteristics at sensory and motor thresholds. Kantor G; Alon G; Ho HS Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 74(10):951-62. PubMed ID: 8090846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigation of the efficiency of the shape of chopped pulses using earthworm model. Dali M; Guiho T; Maciejasz P; Rossel O; Guiraud D Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5483-5486. PubMed ID: 30441578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Activation of retinal ganglion cells following epiretinal electrical stimulation with hexagonally arranged bipolar electrodes. Abramian M; Lovell NH; Morley JW; Suaning GJ; Dokos S J Neural Eng; 2011 Jun; 8(3):035004. PubMed ID: 21593545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Micro-reaction chamber electrodes for neural stimulation and recording. Shanmugasundaram B; Gluckman BJ Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():656-9. PubMed ID: 22254394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating the use of different waveforms for intravesical electrical stimulation: a study in the rat. De Bock F; Dirckx J; Wyndaele JJ Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 21181961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Different pulse shapes to obtain small fiber selective activation by anodal blocking--a simulation study. Vucković A; Rijkhoff NJ; Struijk JJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):698-706. PubMed ID: 15132495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes. Weiland JD; Anderson DJ; Humayun MS IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12 Pt 2):1574-9. PubMed ID: 12549739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Waveform efficiency analysis of auditory nerve fiber stimulation for cochlear implants. Lotfi Navaii M; Sadjedi H; Jalali M Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 23918258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal stimulus profiles for neuroprosthetic devices: monophasic versus biphasic stimulation. Tahayori B; Dokos S Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5978-81. PubMed ID: 24111101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Perception of Ramped Pulse Shapes in Cochlear Implant Users. Navntoft CA; Landsberger DM; Barkat TR; Marozeau J Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211061116. PubMed ID: 34935552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of bipolar cuff electrode design on block thresholds in high-frequency electrical neural conduction block. Ackermann DM; Foldes EL; Bhadra N; Kilgore KL IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Oct; 17(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 19840914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrical stimulation in isolated rabbit retina. Shyu JS; Maia M; Weiland JD; Ohearn T; Chen SJ; Margalit E; Suzuki S; Humayun MS IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 17009488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]