These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17873983)

  • 1. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging.
    Mischkowski RA; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Dreiseidler T; Keeve E; Zöller JE
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Oct; 38(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 17873983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging.
    Mischkowski RA; Scherer P; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Keeve E; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18195248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
    Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion of lower gingival carcinoma: comparison with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Momin MA; Okochi K; Watanabe H; Imaizumi A; Omura K; Amagasa T; Okada N; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 18653297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of digital volume tomography in maxillofacial trauma.
    Choudhary AB; Motwani MB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Yadav AO; Panchbhai A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):e135-40. PubMed ID: 21277069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
    Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
    Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images.
    Kamrun N; Tetsumura A; Nomura Y; Yamaguchi S; Baba O; Nakamura S; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 23522648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital transversal slice imaging in dental-maxillofacial radiology: from pantomography to digital volume tomography.
    Fuhrmann A; Schulze D; Rother U; Vesper M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 14552150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography on Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Leonardi Dutra K; Haas L; Porporatti AL; Flores-Mir C; Nascimento Santos J; Mezzomo LA; Corrêa M; De Luca Canto G
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 26902914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.