These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17874063)

  • 1. Reliable confidence intervals in quantitative genetics: narrow-sense heritability.
    Fabbro T; Davison AC; Steinger T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2007 Nov; 115(7):933-44. PubMed ID: 17874063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A distribution model for heritability.
    Magnussen S
    Genome; 1992 Dec; 35(6):931-8. PubMed ID: 1473726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast and Accurate Construction of Confidence Intervals for Heritability.
    Schweiger R; Kaufman S; Laaksonen R; Kleber ME; März W; Eskin E; Rosset S; Halperin E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1181-1192. PubMed ID: 27259052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating narrow-sense heritability using family data from admixed populations.
    Athanasiadis G; Speed D; Andersen MK; Appel EVR; Grarup N; Brandslund I; Jørgensen ME; Larsen CVL; Bjerregaard P; Hansen T; Albrechtsen A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Jun; 124(6):751-762. PubMed ID: 32273574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of epistatic variance components and heritability in founder populations and crosses.
    Young AI; Durbin R
    Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1405-16. PubMed ID: 25326236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Stochastic Approximation Techniques to Efficiently Construct Confidence Intervals for Heritability.
    Schweiger R; Fisher E; Rahmani E; Shenhav L; Rosset S; Halperin E
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):794-808. PubMed ID: 29932739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate confidence intervals for heritability from method R estimates.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Golden BL; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Aug; 75(8):2041-6. PubMed ID: 9263049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for a variance ratio, or for heritability, in an unbalanced mixed linear model.
    Harville DA; Fenech AP
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 4005371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision of the reportable value-Statistical optimization of the number of replicates.
    Burdick RK; Ermer J
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2019 Jan; 162():149-157. PubMed ID: 30240988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The consistency of quantitative genetic estimates in field and laboratory in the yellow dung fly.
    Blanckenhorn WU
    Genetica; 2002 Mar; 114(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 12041830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of REML and Gibbs sampling estimates of multi-trait genetic parameters in Scots pine.
    Waldmann P; Ericsson T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 May; 112(8):1441-51. PubMed ID: 16544126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved confidence intervals for the linkage disequilibrium method for estimating effective population size.
    Jones AT; Ovenden JR; Wang YG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Oct; 117(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 27005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias and precision in QST estimates: problems and some solutions.
    O'Hara RB; Merilä J
    Genetics; 2005 Nov; 171(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 16085700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-sided tolerance intervals for balanced and unbalanced random effects models.
    Hoffman D; Kringle R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 15796296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fast and reliable computational method for estimating population genetic parameters.
    Vasco DA
    Genetics; 2008 Jun; 179(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 18505868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision of variance components in occupational posture recordings: a simulation study of different data collection strategies.
    Liv P; Mathiassen SE; Svendsen SW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():58. PubMed ID: 22533627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical and factorial mating designs for quantitative genetic analysis in tetrasomic potato.
    Ortiz R; Golmirzaie A
    Theor Appl Genet; 2002 Mar; 104(4):675-679. PubMed ID: 12582673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.