202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17874152)
1. A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.
Dumas R; Blanchard B; Carlier R; de Loubresse CG; Le Huec JC; Marty C; Moinard M; Vital JM
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Jan; 46(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17874152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of spinal curvature in 3D: application to CT images of normal spine.
Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernus F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1895-908. PubMed ID: 18364545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalized X-ray 3-D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine from hybrid statistical and image-based models.
Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Labelle H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1422-35. PubMed ID: 19336299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quasi-automatic 3D reconstruction of the full spine from low-dose biplanar X-rays based on statistical inferences and image analysis.
Gajny L; Ebrahimi S; Vergari C; Angelini E; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 30382429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.
Hocquelet A; Cornelis F; Jirot A; Castaings L; de Sèze M; Hauger O
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3154-3161. PubMed ID: 27323963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences.
Humbert L; De Guise JA; Aubert B; Godbout B; Skalli W
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 19230743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images.
Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography.
Dumas R; Le Bras A; Champain N; Savidan M; Mitton D; Kalifa G; Steib JP; de Guise JA; Skalli W
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jun; 26(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 15147749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The correlation comparison of vertebral axial rotation relative to curvature and torsion in scoliosis by simplified 3D spine model.
Lin H
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1517-20. PubMed ID: 17945649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the 3-d reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images.
Delorme S; Petit Y; de Guise JA; Labelle H; Aubin CE; Dansereau J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):989-98. PubMed ID: 12892326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computerized method for evaluating scoliotic deformities using elliptical pattern recognition in X-ray spine images.
Pinheiro AP; Coelho JC; Veiga ACP; Vrtovec T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():85-92. PubMed ID: 29852970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the reproducibility and reliability of sagittal vertebral inclination measurements from MR images of the spine.
Vrtovec T; Pernuš F; Likar B
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Oct; 38(7):620-7. PubMed ID: 24881499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of the spine from a single X-ray image and prior vertebra models.
Novosad J; Cheriet F; Petit Y; Labelle H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1628-39. PubMed ID: 15376511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.
Gille O; Champain N; Benchikh-El-Fegoun A; Vital JM; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17334292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articulated spine models for 3-D reconstruction from partial radiographic data.
Boisvert J; Cheriet F; Pennec X; Labelle H; Ayache N
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2565-74. PubMed ID: 18990626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Rib Vertebra Angle Difference and its Measurement in 3D for the evaluation of early onset scoliosis.
Foley G; Aubin CE; Labelle H; Sanders J; d'Astous J; Johnston C; Parent S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():238-41. PubMed ID: 22744499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D detailed reconstruction of vertebrae with low dose digital stereoradiography.
Le Bras A; Laporte S; Mitton D; de Guise JA; Skalli W
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():286-90. PubMed ID: 15457739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D spine reconstruction of postoperative patients from multi-level manifold ensembles.
Kadoury S; Labelle H; Parent S
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 3):361-8. PubMed ID: 25320820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
