These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1787432)

  • 1. [Imaging techniques of the breast in 1991. 1].
    Flageat J; Vicens JL; Buchon R
    J Radiol; 1991 Dec; 72(12):645-54. PubMed ID: 1787432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Classification of medical technologies of breast studies].
    Rozhkova NI; Kochetova GP
    Med Tekh; 2000; (4):41-4. PubMed ID: 10984882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Combination of mammography with automated ultrasound (Sono-X) in routine diagnosis?].
    Richter K; Winzer KJ; Frohberg HD; Guski H; Prihoda H; Schmitt HJ; Hamm B
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():37-41. PubMed ID: 10063570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
    Ahmed R; Ali SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
    Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An MRI/US/x-ray compatible breast localization marker: in vivo evaluation.
    Li Y; Holloway CM; Purcell CM; Wang J; Plewes DB
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1557-66. PubMed ID: 16321745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: imaging findings mimicking malignancy and histopathological features.
    Ruiz-Delgado ML; López-Ruiz JA; Eizaguirre B; Saiz A; Astigarraga E; Fernández-Temprano Z
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17325921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
    Rissanen TJ; Mäkäräinen HP; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Lindholm EL
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 7619612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Value of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Muth CP
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():33-6. PubMed ID: 10063569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The specific features of diagnosis of breast diseases accompanied by the retracted nipple syndrome].
    Rozhkova NI; Berzin SA; Shevchenko SA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2006; (4):14-8. PubMed ID: 17633884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indications for MR mammography. A Belgian study.
    Van Goethem M; Biltjes IG; De Schepper AM
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 11025925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.