BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17874543)

  • 1. Clinicopathological evaluation of radical retropubic prostatectomy-positive outcome even at institutes with relatively limited experience.
    Okamura T; Akita H; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2007 Aug; 53(8):533-6; discussion 537. PubMed ID: 17874543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relevance of postcatheter removal incontinence to postoperative urinary function after radical prostatectomy.
    Saito S; Namiki S; Numahata K; Satoh M; Ishidoya S; Ito A; Arai Y
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1191-6. PubMed ID: 16984551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perineal radical prostatectomy in the age of laparoscopy].
    Parra RO; Laguna Pes MP; García Pérez M; Isorna de la Riva S
    Arch Esp Urol; 1993 Dec; 46(10):879-8; discussion 885-6. PubMed ID: 8141619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload.
    Di Pierro GB; Baumeister P; Stucki P; Beatrice J; Danuser H; Mattei A
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21035248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
    Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Improve recovery of urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a clinical report of 51 cases].
    Ma LL; Hong K; Huang Y; Wang GL; Xiao CL; Lu J; Tian XJ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 46(24):1882-4. PubMed ID: 19134376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
    Parsons JK; Bennett JL
    Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 18267330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy and postoperative urinary continence.
    Razi A; Yahyazadeh SR; Sedighi Gilani MA; Kazemeyni SM
    Urol J; 2009; 6(1):23-6; discussion 26. PubMed ID: 19241337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Comparison between laparoscopic and retropubic prostatectomy based on a series of 251 cases].
    Plainard X; Druet Cabanac M; Descazeaud A; Paulhac P; Lesaux N; Dumas JP; Colombeau P
    Prog Urol; 2008 Jun; 18(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 18558325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prevention of incontinence after radical prostatectomy].
    Liu DY; Tang Q; Wang MW; Liu SX; Wang J; Zhou YF; Wu YX; Zhou WL; Zhu Y; Zhang CY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):369-71. PubMed ID: 16638343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup.
    Giberti C; Gallo F; Schenone M; Cortese P; Ninotta G
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2204-8. PubMed ID: 19296976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
    Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urodynamic evaluation of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: our experience.
    Minervini R; Felipetto R; Morelli G; Fontana N; Fiorentini L
    Acta Urol Belg; 1996 Dec; 64(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 9008971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
    Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
    Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Need for high radiation dose (>or=70 gy) in early postoperative irradiation after radical prostatectomy: a single-institution analysis of 334 high-risk, node-negative patients.
    Cozzarini C; Montorsi F; Fiorino C; Alongi F; Bolognesi A; Da Pozzo LF; Guazzoni G; Freschi M; Roscigno M; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Di Muzio N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):966-74. PubMed ID: 19619960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified Pfannenstiel approach for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a 3-year experience.
    Manoharan M; Ayyathurai R; Nieder AM; Soloway MS
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 17440438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: effects on surgical difficulty and pathologic outcomes.
    Yazici S; Inci K; Yuksel S; Bilen CY; Ozen H
    Urology; 2009 Apr; 73(4):856-9. PubMed ID: 19022487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Has time already passed the open radical prostatectomy?].
    Viitanen J
    Duodecim; 2011; 127(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 21528526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.