These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Measuring access to effective care among elderly medicare enrollees in managed and Fee-for-Service care: a retrospective cohort study. Barton MB; Dayhoff DA; Soumerai SB; Rosenbach ML; Fletcher RH BMC Health Serv Res; 2001; 1():11. PubMed ID: 11716798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the effect of quality reports on the health plan choices of Medicare beneficiaries. Uhrig JD; Short PF Inquiry; 2002-2003 Winter; 39(4):355-71. PubMed ID: 12638711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in the structure of CAHPS measures among the medicare fee-for-service, medicare managed care, and privately insured populations. Bender RH; Garfinkel SA Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 11482586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicare HMOs, FFS plans provide equal care following heart attack. Capitation Rates Data; 2001 Aug; 6(8):92-3. PubMed ID: 11526859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare members like plans, providers, but could be happier. Public Sect Contract Rep; 1999 Mar; 5(3):43-5. PubMed ID: 10351424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How an integrated system thrives with physicians at the lead. Podbielski JA Internist; 1994 Oct; 35(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 10137815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marketing and finance issues in provider-sponsored Medicare HMOs. Laleman M; Scibilia K Healthc Strateg; 1998 Mar; 2(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 10345999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of care by insurance plan. A fee-for-service versus health maintenance organization comparison. Silcox PD Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 14618775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Home health care outcomes under capitated and fee-for-service payment. Shaughnessy PW; Schlenker RE; Hittle DF Health Care Financ Rev; 1994; 16(1):187-222. PubMed ID: 10140154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality measurement in medicaid managed care and fee-for-service: the New York State experience. Roohan PJ; Butch JM; Anarella JP; Gesten F; Shure K Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 16679438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HMO performance: the debate goes on. Sullivan K Health Aff (Millwood); 2002; 21(5):303-4; author reply 304-5. PubMed ID: 12224902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can managed care save Medicare? Achieving high quality and low costs through managed care. Giffin R Manag Care Q; 1996; 4(4):12-29. PubMed ID: 10162547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CMS dangling carrot. Up to 50,000 dollars available in P4P plan. DoBias M Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(43):33. PubMed ID: 17128588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Law and the public's health. Medicare reform. Rosenbaum S Public Health Rep; 2003; 118(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 12690070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Getting it all done. Organizational factors linked with comprehensive primary care. Russell G; Dahrouge S; Tuna M; Hogg W; Geneau R; Gebremichael G Fam Pract; 2010 Oct; 27(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 20534791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Healthcare options for Medicare beneficiaries. Tipton S; Brandt EN J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Apr; 95(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 11957846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should we stop making a fuss over HMOs? Pretzer M Med Econ; 2000 May; 77(10):41, 45. PubMed ID: 11010248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When an HMO sends you Medicare patients. Gramling A Med Econ; 1995 May; 72(9):34-6, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10141914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]