These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17875596)

  • 1. Accurate geometric calibration in stepping-table digital subtraction angiography.
    Schmidt MA; Nayak SL; Belli AM; Britten AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Oct; 80(958):835-40. PubMed ID: 17875596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction of XRII geometric distortion using a liquid-filled grid and image subtraction.
    Holdsworth DW; Pollmann SI; Nikolov HN; Fahrig R
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15719955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of image intensifier and distortion for DSA localization studies.
    Coste E; Gibon D; Rousseau J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():70-3. PubMed ID: 9059298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
    Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
    Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.
    Read RL; Duncan CG; Wallace AD; Perry JA; Duerr FM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 241(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 22947163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localization of cerebral arterovenous malformations using digital angiography.
    Vitali A; Salmoiraghi P; Butti I; Pompei L; Sarti E; Caverni L; Petroboni E; Merli R; Remuzzi A
    Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2024-30. PubMed ID: 11011729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography.
    Ionasec RI; Heigl B; Hornegger J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 19231134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A digital subtraction angiography system based on LUT algorithms].
    Chen X; Li K; Zhou L; Chen J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 23(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 16706383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy and reproducibility of a global method to correct for geometric image distortion in the x-ray imaging chain.
    Gronenschild E
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1875-88. PubMed ID: 9434970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
    Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11487847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
    Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New method for geometric calibration and distortion correction of conventional C-arm.
    Meng C; Zhang J; Zhou F; Wang T
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Sep; 52():49-56. PubMed ID: 25014497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of digital subtraction angiography for the quantification of atherosclerosis.
    Key H; Jackson PC; Thomas EA; Jeans WD; Davies ER
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Nov; 60(719):1083-8. PubMed ID: 3318998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs.
    Omary RA; Henseler KP; Unal O; Maciolek LJ; Finn JP; Li D; Nemcek AA; Vogelzang RL; Grist TM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 11756103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallax-free intra-operative X-ray image stitching.
    Wang L; Traub J; Weidert S; Heining SM; Euler E; Navab N
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Oct; 14(5):674-86. PubMed ID: 20561811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.