BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1787706)

  • 1. Low-frequency energy deficit in electrolaryngeal speech.
    Qi YY; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1250-6. PubMed ID: 1787706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Production of intonation and contrastive stress in electrolaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):605-12. PubMed ID: 6521468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term average spectral characteristics of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.
    Ng ML; Liu H; Zhao Q; Lam PK
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 19261410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of electrolaryngeal speech by adaptive filtering.
    Espy-Wilson CY; Chari VR; MacAuslan JM; Huang CB; Walsh MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 9859882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of electrolaryngeal speech quality using a supraglottal voice source with compensation of vocal tract characteristics.
    Wu L; Wan C; Wang S; Wan M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 23412568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrolaryngeal speech produced by laryngectomized subjects: perceptual characteristics.
    Weiss MS; Basili AG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 4010259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communication of lexical tones in Cantonese alaryngeal speech.
    Ching TY; Williams R; Van Hasselt A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 8084186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of lexical stress in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Garzione B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 6645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vocal roughness and jitter characteristics of vowels produced by esophageal speakers.
    Smith BE; Weinberg B; Feth LL; Horii Y
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Jun; 21(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 703274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3339865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.
    Ng ML; Gilbert HR; Lerman JW
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 11125259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative acoustic analysis of voice production by near-total laryngectomy and normal laryngeal speakers.
    Hoasjoe DK; Martin GF; Doyle PC; Wong FS
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 1564748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.
    Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):766-79. PubMed ID: 16378472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of ratings of four artificial larynges.
    Pindzola RH; Moffet B
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Dec; 21(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 3235708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electroacoustic test of the voice of laryngectomized and rehabilitated patients with tracheo-esophageal prosthesis].
    Motta G; Motta G; D'Angelo L; Cesari U
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1988; 8 Suppl 20():131-9. PubMed ID: 3073631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis of pneumatic artificial larynx.
    Xu JJ; Chen X; Lu MP; Qiao MZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19932853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.