These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1787719)

  • 1. Frequency discrimination as a function of signal frequency and level in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1371-86. PubMed ID: 1787719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.
    Moore BC; Peters RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2881-93. PubMed ID: 1629481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency discrimination in regions of normal and impaired sensitivity.
    Turner CW; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 7087423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency discrimination of short- versus long-duration tones by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 3560895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extension of a temporal model of frequency discrimination: intensity effects in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wakefield GH; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):613-9. PubMed ID: 3973232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11931316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 3958322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency discrimination as a function of tonal duration and excitation-pattern slopes in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1034-44. PubMed ID: 3700858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.
    Micheyl C; Xiao L; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 22841571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage.
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Collet L
    Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):524-37. PubMed ID: 11872610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 1775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus duration and frequency discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Hall JW; Wood EJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 6738037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Simon HJ; Yund EW
    Ear Hear; 1993 Jun; 14(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 8344476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of psychophysical tuning curves in normal and pathological ears.
    Carney AE; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):268-78. PubMed ID: 6826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1604-16. PubMed ID: 12656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.