BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17877568)

  • 61. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes.
    Kossman SP; Scheidenhelm SL
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 18317257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Evaluation of user acceptance of information systems in health care--the value of questionnaires.
    Ammenwerth E; Kaiser F; Wilhelmy I; Höfer S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():643-8. PubMed ID: 14664060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
    Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [PIPEQ--a method for measurement of user satisfaction in mental health services].
    Garratt A; Danielsen K; Bjertnaes ØA; Ruud T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1478-80. PubMed ID: 16732342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Development and validation of the Family Meaning of Nursing-Home Visits Scale.
    Tsai HH; Tsai YF; Huang TS
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Aug; 21(15-16):2108-17. PubMed ID: 22672063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Understanding and measuring patients' assessment of the quality of nursing care.
    Lynn MR; McMillen BJ; Sidani S
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 17495571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.
    Williams AM; Kristjanson LJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19077011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: psychometric testing of the Classical Arabic version.
    Al Khalaileh MA; Bond AE; Beckstrand RL; Al-Talafha A
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Mar; 66(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 20423401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish psychiatric nurses of job motivation scale.
    Engin E; Cam O
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2009 Jun; 16(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 19538603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Ease of care with patient controlled analgesia systems: questionnaire development and validation.
    Harding G; Vallow S; Leidy NK; Olson W; Hewitt DJ; Polomano R; Nelson WW; Schein JR
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Sep; 59(5):530-41. PubMed ID: 17681082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Reliability and construct validity of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II in an adult Turkish population.
    Pinar R; Celik R; Bahcecik N
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 19448522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards aged sexuality: validity and internal consistency of the Dutch version of the Aging Sexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale.
    Mahieu L; de Casterlé BD; Van Elssen K; Gastmans C
    J Adv Nurs; 2013 Nov; 69(11):2584-96. PubMed ID: 23444972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Measuring barriers to incontinence care seeking.
    Heit M; Blackwell L; Kelly S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 17621356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Pretest and post-test attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system.
    Murphy CA; Maynard M; Morgan G
    Comput Nurs; 1994; 12(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 7954068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Users' satisfaction on the electronic nursing record system.
    Choi EY; Chung EJ; Lee HS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():855. PubMed ID: 17102427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The quality of postoperative pain management from the perspectives of patients, nurses and patient records.
    Gunningberg L; Idvall E
    J Nurs Manag; 2007 Oct; 15(7):756-66. PubMed ID: 17897153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Development and testing of the Satisfaction in Nursing Scale.
    Lynn MR; Morgan JC; Moore KA
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 19448520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. When usage and user satisfaction differ: the case of an electronic discharge summary.
    Bürkle T; Engel PA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1093-7. PubMed ID: 17911884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.