76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17877654)
1. Trial of a new pain assessment tool in patients with low education: the full cup test.
Ergün U; Say B; Ozer G; Yildirim O; Kocatürk O; Konar D; Kudiaki C; Inan L
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Oct; 61(10):1692-6. PubMed ID: 17877654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three pain scales after impacted third molar surgery.
Isik K; Unsal A; Kalayci A; Durmus E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 21441046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of pain among a group of Nigerian dental patients.
Odai ED; Ehizele AO; Enabulele JE
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():251. PubMed ID: 26087661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department.
Mohan H; Ryan J; Whelan B; Wakai A
Emerg Med J; 2010 May; 27(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 20442167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breaking barriers: Exploring the Full Cup Test (FCT) pain scale at a tertiary care hospital.
Ghouri N; Mushtaq M
Pak J Med Sci; 2024 Jan; 40(2ICON Suppl):S35-S41. PubMed ID: 38328655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
Clark P; Lavielle P; Martínez H
J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.
Strand LI; Ljunggren AE; Bogen B; Ask T; Johnsen TB
Eur J Pain; 2008 Oct; 12(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18289893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer pain intensity measurements in outpatients: preferences and comparison of pain scales among patients, caregivers, physicians and nurses in southern India.
Koshy RC; Kuriakose R; Mathew A; Chandran N
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2004; 18(3):5-13. PubMed ID: 15364628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain assessment in Nigerians--Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Rating Scale compared.
Soyannwo OA; Amanor-Boadu SD; Sanya AO; Gureje O
West Afr J Med; 2000; 19(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 11391832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pain assessment in Nigerians--visual analogue scale and verbal rating scale compared.
Magbagbeola JA
West Afr J Med; 2001; 20(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 11922154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of easily applicable pain measurement tools for the assessment of pain in demented patients.
Pesonen A; Kauppila T; Tarkkila P; Sutela A; Niinistö L; Rosenberg PH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 May; 53(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 19419361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
Willems P
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
Li L; Liu X; Herr K
Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between MPQ and VAS in 962 patients. A rationale for their use.
Majani G; Tiengo M; Giardini A; Calori G; De Micheli P; Battaglia A
Minerva Anestesiol; 2003; 69(1-2):67-73. PubMed ID: 12677163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurses' assessment of pain in surgical patients.
Sloman R; Rosen G; Rom M; Shir Y
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16164473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Tanen DA; Miller S; French T; Riffenburgh RH
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 12764341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual Analog Scale pain reporting was standardized.
Kane RL; Bershadsky B; Rockwood T; Saleh K; Islam NC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 15878476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity.
Gillam DG; Bulman JS; Newman HN
Community Dent Health; 1997 Jun; 14(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 9225538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of efficacy endpoints in clinical trials with over the counter analgesics for headache.
Aicher B; Peil H; Peil B; Diener HC
Cephalalgia; 2012 Oct; 32(13):953-62. PubMed ID: 22763497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]