These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17877674)

  • 1. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term.
    Nassar AH; Awwad J; Khalil AM; Abu-Musa A; Mehio G; Usta IM
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17877674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
    Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labour induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death.
    Geels YP; de Gouberville MC; Visser L; van Asten HA
    Trop Doct; 2010 Apr; 40(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 20305098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised comparative study on sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 13 to 20 weeks.
    Bhattacharjee N; Saha SP; Ghoshroy SC; Bhowmik S; Barui G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 48(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 18366490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy.
    Tang OS; Lau WN; Chan CC; Ho PC
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1001-5. PubMed ID: 15327617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised comparison between sublingual, oral and vaginal route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical ripening in first-trimester pregnancy termination under local anaesthesia.
    Saxena P; Sarda N; Salhan S; Nandan D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Feb; 48(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 18275580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.