These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17878083)

  • 1. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography.
    Hartmann MS; Barletta FB; Camargo Fontanella VR; Vanni JR
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):962-5. PubMed ID: 17878083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
    Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
    Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
    López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of EDTA preparations on rotary root canal instrumentation.
    Whitbeck ER; Swenson K; Tordik PA; Kondor SA; Webb TD; Sun J
    J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 25190604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
    Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
    Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography.
    Ozgur Uyanik M; Cehreli ZC; Ozgen Mocan B; Tasman Dagli F
    J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):668-71. PubMed ID: 16793477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals.
    Hilaly Eid GE; Wanees Amin SA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 21862367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.